060 279 5587 info@sitect.co.za 139 Davies Street, Doornfontein, Johannesburg, 2001 Gauteng, SA
Services / Business & Digital Strategy / Product Strategy
6 weeks · Discovery-led · ICP & JTBD-grounded

What to build next. In what order. And why.

A 6-week, senior-led engagement that turns "we have too many ideas" into a defensible Now/Next/Later roadmap. Built from real customer discovery, scored against impact and effort, and tied to the metrics that make your investors nod.

6 weeks Discovery-first Outcome-led roadmap From R9,000

Four reasons your roadmap is a wishlist, not a plan.

SA founders we audit have three things in common: too many ideas, too few users to talk to, and a Trello board with 87 cards. Here's the pattern we see every time.

!

HiPPO-driven priorities

"The CEO mentioned it." "The biggest customer asked for it." "It came up in a board call." Loudest voice wins — not the highest-impact opportunity.

61%of features go unused after ship
!

Feature-factory thinking

"What ships next?" instead of "what problem are we solving?" Every two weeks, more output, less outcome. Velocity climbs, retention doesn't.

2.4×ship rate vs outcome rate
!

Discovery skipped

Last user interview was six months ago. We're shipping based on what the team thinks users want. Every release rolls a dice on retention.

3 mo+since last user research
!

No defunding muscle

The backlog only grows. Nothing ever gets killed. The team spends 30% of cycles maintaining features that 4% of users touch. Quietly bleeding.

87 / 12backlog vs annual capacity

Six layers. Every one has to be solid.

Most teams jump straight to the roadmap (layer 4) without ever doing layers 1–3. The roadmap is the easy part. The diagnostic and the discovery underneath are where the real strategy lives.

01
Product vision & strategy
The 3-year aspiration + the 12-month strategic bets that get you closer. The "what game are we playing" call.
3-year
02
ICP & jobs-to-be-done
Who you serve, what they hire your product to do, what would make them fire it. Defended with real interview data.
Quarterly
03
Bets & opportunities
Themed problem areas worth investing in. Each with an opportunity statement, hypothesis, and success metric.
Quarterly
04
Roadmap (Now / Next / Later)
Initiatives scored by impact × effort, sequenced into horizons. The visual artefact you actually share.
Monthly
05
Metrics & targets
North-star metric + 3–5 leading indicators. Every initiative tied to a metric it should move.
Weekly
06
Continuous discovery cadence
The rhythm of weekly user interviews that keeps the whole stack honest. Without this, layers 1–5 rot in 90 days.
Weekly

Impact × Effort. Then defunding.

Every roadmap item lands on the same 2×2 matrix. The quick-wins quadrant is where you spend Q2. The big-bets quadrant is where you make a deliberate strategic call. And the bottom-right quadrant is where you actively defund — kill, don't backlog.

  • RICE scoring — Reach × Impact × Confidence ÷ Effort. Numerical, comparable, contestable.
  • Evidence tagging — every score backed by interview quote, usage data or competitive signal.
  • Confidence intervals — high-confidence items get expedited; low-confidence items hit discovery first.
  • Defunding decisions — at least one feature gets killed per cycle. Backlog stays under capacity.
  • Strategic bets — 1–2 big-impact / high-effort items per year, ring-fenced from short-term pressure.
  • Quick-wins quota — at least 30% of cycles reserved for high-impact / low-effort wins.

Eight ways to validate before you build.

Building first and asking later is how teams ship the wrong thing. We use 8 lightweight techniques to validate at the cheapest possible stage — depending on the question and the risk.

Customer interviews

1-on-1 jobs-to-be-done interviews. 6–12 per cycle. Open-ended, never leading. The single highest-ROI activity in product.

Risk · build wrong thing~3h each

Fake-door tests

Build the button, not the feature. Measure click-through, count signups for "coming soon" — kill the feature if nobody clicks.

Risk · demand uncertainty~3 days

Click-through prototypes

Figma prototype, real users, observation. See where they get stuck, what they expect, what they call things.

Risk · usability~5 days

Wizard of Oz

Look automated, run manually. Validate that customers will actually use a workflow before automating it. We do this for AI features all the time.

Risk · viability~1 week

Usage analytics

What features are actually used? Where do users drop off? Mixpanel / PostHog instrumentation tells you the truth your stakeholders don't.

Risk · ship-blindOngoing

A/B tests

Don't argue about copy in a meeting. Ship both, measure, decide. Only useful when traffic supports statistical significance.

Risk · opinion-driven2–4 wk

Beta cohorts

Ship to 5–20 friendly customers first. Get feedback before everyone sees the bug. Standard for high-stakes changes.

Risk · production-bug2 weeks

Price probes

Test pricing in real conversations before publishing it. The Van Westendorp model. Avoid the "we'll know when we launch" tax.

Risk · price wrong~1 week

Tools, not religions.

We use the right tool for the question. The frameworks below are the ones we lean on most; we'll only apply the ones that match your situation.

Jobs-to-be-Done
Frame features around the job customers hire the product to do, not the demographics of who's hiring it.
When · ICP framing
Opportunity Solution Tree
Teresa Torres' framework: from outcome → opportunities → solutions → experiments. Keeps you honest.
When · roadmap design
RICE scoring
Reach × Impact × Confidence ÷ Effort. Numerical prioritisation that's contestable, not subjective.
When · backlog scoring
North-star metric
One number that captures product value delivered. Everything else flows from it.
When · metrics design
Wardley mapping
Plot capabilities by user value × evolution maturity. Surfaces what to build, buy, outsource.
When · build-vs-buy
HEART framework
Google's CX metrics: Happiness, Engagement, Adoption, Retention, Task success. Better than pure NPS.
When · UX metrics
Kano model
Classify features as basic, performance or delight. Avoid spending Q3 on something users already expect.
When · feature classify
Van Westendorp
Price-sensitivity model. Four questions, real customers, finds the band where willingness-to-pay sits.
When · pricing research

Six artefacts. All editable, all yours.

No 100-page strategy decks. Six punchy artefacts your team can ship from on Monday. All in Notion / Linear / Figma — your team can edit without us.

01 · Discovery brief

Interview notes & synthesis

Coded themes from 10–15 user interviews. Direct quotes, opportunity statements, surprising findings. The evidence the rest of the strategy stands on.

Notion · ~30 pages
02 · ICP & JTBD canvas

One-pager · validated

Who the product is for, what jobs they hire it to do, what would make them fire it. Tight enough to fit on one wall.

1-page canvas
03 · Opportunity tree

Outcomes → opportunities → solutions

The tree of what we're going after, why, and the candidate solutions for each opportunity. Editable in your tool of choice.

Mermaid · Miro · FigJam
04 · Now / Next / Later

Roadmap · scored · sequenced

The headline artefact. 12–20 prioritised initiatives. Each with a hypothesis, success metric, RICE score, owner, and effort estimate.

Linear · ProductBoard · Notion
05 · KPI scorecard

North-star + leading indicators

One north-star metric. 3–5 leading indicators. Each initiative tied to the metric it should move. Cadence + ownership.

1-page scorecard
06 · Discovery rhythm

The weekly cadence playbook

The continuous-discovery operating manual: how to recruit, run, code and act on weekly interviews. So this isn't a one-shot engagement.

Notion playbook · ~20 pages

5 phases. Listen → Frame → Score → Sequence → Rhythm.

You'll spend ~12 hours across the engagement. Most of it observing user interviews (highly recommended) + a 2-day prioritisation workshop in week 4.

01
Week 1 · 1 hr

Audit current state

Backlog, analytics, NPS, support tickets. The baseline reality before we layer strategy on top.

02
Week 2–3 · 4 hrs

Discovery interviews

10–15 user interviews. We run them; you observe at least 3. Themes coded, synthesised, evidence-tagged.

03
Week 4 · 4 hrs

Prioritisation workshop

2-day in-person workshop. Opportunity tree, RICE scoring, defunding decisions, Now/Next/Later drafted.

04
Week 5 · 2 hrs

Roadmap polish

Stakeholder review (eng, sales, CS), KPI scorecard, hypothesis docs, ownership locked in.

05
Week 6 · 1 hr

Rhythm install

Discovery-cadence playbook installed. Your team runs week-1 of continuous discovery with us shadowing.

The numbers behind a roadmap that shipped.

Aggregated from product teams we engaged 6+ months ago. Your numbers will be yours — these are the order-of-magnitude bracket.

71%
"Now" items shipped
Median completion rate for items in the Now column at the 6-month mark.
−38%
Backlog size
Median reduction in backlog through defunding + scope tightening.
+44%
Feature adoption
Median uptake on shipped features (vs the "shipped but unused" baseline).
+18%
Net retention
Median NRR lift attributable to the new roadmap focus.

Pick the depth. We deliver in 3–8 weeks.

Fee fixed in writing. The strategy is yours — implementation is your team's job. We don't ship features; we shape the strategy that informs which features you ship.

Rapid review

3-week diagnostic

R9,000
/project · ex 15% VAT
  • Backlog audit
  • 5–6 user interviews
  • 1-page Now/Next sketch
  • Top-3 defunding recommendations
  • 30-min readout
Choose Rapid →
Embedded

8-week + coaching

R72,000+
+ optional fractional CPO retainer · ex VAT
  • Everything in 6-week
  • Embedded with PM team
  • Weekly discovery shadowing (8wk)
  • Monthly strategy review (6mo)
  • Fractional CPO from R18k/mo
Talk to us →

Common questions from founders & heads of product.

If yours isn't here, send us your current roadmap — we'll come back with a written critique in 48h. No sales call.

We don't have many users yet — is it too early for this?
Probably yes. The engagement leans heavily on user interviews; under 20–30 active users + 5 paying customers, the signal is too thin. We'll be honest about this in the discovery call. For pre-PMF teams, we offer a much lighter Pre-PMF audit (R 5k) instead — interviews focus on prospects + early users, output is a "should you keep building this thing" verdict.
How is this different from hiring a Head of Product?
A Head of Product runs the function week-to-week. We design the strategy they execute. Most early-stage SA companies hire a Head of Product before having a written strategy — which sets the new hire up to fail. We give you the strategy before you make the hire, or use the engagement to define the role you're hiring for.
Will you do the interviews or will we?
We do them. Customers tell a third party things they'll never tell the founder. We take notes, transcribe, code the themes, share the synthesis. You observe at least 3 (strongly recommended). Total: 10–15 interviews, ~25–35 hours of our time.
Does this mean killing our backlog?
Yes, partially. The single most uncomfortable + valuable thing we do is defund features. Across our engagements, median backlog reduction is ~38%. Items don't die forever — they go to a "considered + parked" list with the reasoning written down. If conditions change you can bring them back.
What if our team disagrees with the roadmap?
Good — we want that. The 2-day workshop is co-designed; we don't deliver a roadmap at your team, we build it with them. By the end of day 2, the team has consensus, or we've surfaced exactly where the disagreement is and what would resolve it. Roadmaps imposed by consultants don't get shipped.
Will Sitect also build what's on the roadmap?
Sometimes. If your team has engineering capacity, you build it. If you don't, we offer a separate Software & SaaS Development engagement to deliver specific roadmap items. There's no implicit upsell — the strategy is yours to execute however.
How do we know the strategy isn't out of date in 3 months?
It will be. That's why we install the continuous-discovery cadence in week 6 — so the roadmap stays current with reality. Most clients schedule a 6-month "refresh review" with us (R 10k) to re-score, defund and add. The strategy is a living thing, not a deliverable.
Can you guarantee it'll improve our metrics?
No — and any consultant who guarantees this is selling theatre. We guarantee strategy quality: research-grounded, framework-rigorous, defensible. Execution is on your team. That said, of teams who actually executed their roadmap, ~80% saw measurable lift on their north-star metric within 6 months.

Send us your backlog.
We'll send back the cut list.

Export your current Trello / Linear / Notion backlog and drop it in our form. Within 48 hours we'll send back a written critique: which items look high-leverage, which look like noise, and which 3 we'd defund tomorrow. Plus an honest read on whether a full engagement is right for you.

You'll get back in 48h

  • High-leverage items flagged
  • Top-3 defunding candidates
  • Riskiest implicit assumption
  • Honest "should you hire us" verdict

More Business & Digital Strategy services

Digital Transformation Roadmap

A clear plan to modernise your business.

Go-To-Market Strategy

Launch the right thing, the right way.

Operations & Process Audit

Find the friction. Fix the bottlenecks.