060 279 5587 info@sitect.co.za 139 Davies Street, Doornfontein, Johannesburg, 2001 Gauteng, SA
Services / Business & Digital Strategy / Operations & Process Audit
4 weeks · senior-led · interview + observe + measure

Find the friction. Map the bottlenecks. Then fix them.

A 4-week clinical operations audit that maps how work actually flows through your business — where it stalls, where it duplicates, where humans do what scripts could. Output: a prioritised hit-list of fixes, automation candidates with ROI, and a 90-day execution plan.

4 weeks ROI-modelled fixes 3 process maps From R7,000

The waste is real. It just doesn't sit on a P&L line.

Operational drag is the most expensive line item that's never on a balance sheet. SA mid-market businesses leak 18–32% of operating capacity to friction nobody is paid to fix.

!

"This is how we've always done it"

Process inherited from the previous COO, baked in 2018, never re-examined. Three tool changes later, the workflow still bears the shape of a phantom requirement.

23%avg waste-to-process ratio
!

Tools paid for, not adopted

R12k/mo on a CRM the sales team partly uses. R8k/mo on a project tool engineering doesn't open. Every adoption gap creates a parallel manual process.

R 28k/momedian SaaS underutilisation
!

Heroes hide bottlenecks

One person keeps it all running by working weekends. The process looks fine — until that person takes leave, and the org realises there was a one-person dependency.

1 in 3SA SMEs have a bus-factor of 1
!

Automation backwards

"Let's automate this." But automating a broken process at scale only ships the broken-ness faster. Map first, fix second, automate third.

61%of RPA projects fail at launch

Eight wastes. We score each one.

The classic Lean taxonomy — adapted for service businesses, not just manufacturing. Every process gets scored against each waste. The high-scoring wastes get the fixes.

D

Defects

Rework · errors · returns

Work that has to be redone because it wasn't right the first time. Mis-typed invoices, wrong-sent contracts, FICA forms missing fields.

e.g. "Resent invoice 12% of the time."
O

Overproduction

More than needed

Reports nobody reads. Features nobody uses. Meetings whose attendees couldn't summarise the outcome. Doing more than the customer values.

e.g. "47-page board pack, read 3 pages."
W

Waiting

Stalled work

Work sits in someone's queue. Approvals wait days. Hand-offs sit overnight. The cycle time is mostly air, not labour.

e.g. "Approval cycle = 6 days; touch time = 90 min."
N

Non-utilised talent

Skills wasted

Senior people doing junior work. Skilled people on manual data entry. Smart people in meetings that should be a Slack message.

e.g. "CFO doing PO matching by hand."
T

Transport

Data hand-offs

Information copied between systems. CSV exports across teams. Same data re-keyed 3 times because the systems don't talk.

e.g. "Lead → 4 systems, manually."
I

Inventory

Stockpiled WIP

Backlog of work-in-progress nobody is moving. Drafts gathering dust. Tickets in "in review" for weeks. Pre-built collateral nobody uses.

e.g. "187 tickets older than 30 days."
M

Motion

Wasted movement

Tab-switching. App-hopping. Searching for the right doc, the right form, the right person. Every context switch is friction.

e.g. "Avg AE: 23 tabs open at once."
E

Extra processing

Over-engineered

Approvals required by no policy. Steps in the workflow that nobody can defend. "We always Cc the legal team" — for what reason, exactly?

e.g. "5 sign-offs on a R 800 expense."

Six instruments. Triangulating the truth.

People tell you how the process is meant to work. The system logs show what actually happens. We use both — plus 4 others — because one source alone always lies a little.

Stakeholder interviews

12–18 conversations

Open-ended interviews with operators, supervisors, and customers. We ask what's broken, what's heroic, what's invisible. Coded for themes.

  • 1-hour, recorded with consent
  • Operators · managers · customers
  • Themed in a coding matrix

Gemba walks

go & see

We sit with the team for 2-3 sessions and watch the work happen. Real desks, real screens, real Slack pings. Reality usually disagrees with the SOP.

  • 2–3 observation sessions
  • Note tab-switches, queue-waits
  • Photograph dashboards

System log mining

objective signal

CRM activity, ticket timestamps, accounting transactions, support logs. The truth of how long things actually take — not how long people remember.

  • Read-only access to systems
  • Time-in-state per record
  • Hand-off latencies measured

SaaS audit

tool spend & use

What tools do you pay for, who uses them, and what's the actual adoption rate? We list every subscription and the seats-vs-actives ratio.

  • Spend per tool
  • Seat utilisation
  • Overlap + consolidation

Document trail review

SOPs vs reality

What does the written SOP say vs what actually happens? Gap analysis between the documented process and the operational reality.

  • SOP completeness
  • SOP-vs-reality gap
  • Compliance flag points

Time-tracking sample

2-week diary study

Selected operators track their time in 15-min blocks for 10 working days. Granular ground truth on where labour hours actually go.

  • 15-min block diaries
  • Task taxonomy applied
  • Aggregated heat-map
The deliverable

Before. After.

Anonymised excerpt from a recent engagement (Cape Town financial services firm, R140m turnover). Same process — quote-to-cash — before and after the redesign. Three steps killed, two automated, one moved upstream.

Current state · 4.6 days · 4.3 touch-hrs12 steps

1
Enquiry received · emailunstructured intake
4 min
2
Lead manually entered into CRMduplicate of email body
38 min
3
Triaged + assigned to AESlack ping
6 min
4
AE drafts quote · spreadsheetcopy-paste line items
3.5 hrs
5
Sent for legal reviewCc'd, even if no clauses changed
2 days
6
Sent to CFO for pricing sign-offapproval threshold = R 5k
1.5 days
7
PDF generated · emailed to clientmanual copy-paste header
12 min
8
Internal CRM updated againduplicate entry
8 min
9
Client signs · DocuSeallink sent separately
2 days
10
Signed PDF filed manually in Drivenaming convention varies
4 min
11
Invoice raised in Xeromanual transcription
25 min
12
Project channel created in Slackcopy template by hand
9 min

Future state · 9 hrs · 35 touch-mins7 steps

1
Enquiry → structured formreplaces free-text email intake
2 min
2
Auto-create CRM leadwebhook · 0 manual entry
0 min
3
Auto-routed to AE on round-robinno triage queue
0 min
4
AI-drafted quote in CRMAE reviews · edits · approves
18 min
5
Legal-skip if no custom clausesrule-based: only escalate > R 50k
0 min
6
CFO auto-approve < R 25kthreshold raised post-audit
0 min
7
E-sign + Xero + Slack channelall on signature webhook
15 min
Cycle time
−81%
Touch time
−87%
Steps removed
5 of 12
Annualised value
R 1.9M

Six common patterns. Highest-ROI candidates.

The audit surfaces the friction. These six patterns are where automation pays for itself within 12 weeks. We score each candidate by effort, ROI and risk.

Pattern 01

Document extraction

Reading invoices, contracts, FICA docs into structured fields. Replaces hours of typing. Typical payback in 3-6 weeks.

Effort2–3 weeks
Pattern 02

System-to-system sync

Eliminating manual data hand-offs between CRM, accounting, ops tools. Zapier / n8n / custom webhooks — whichever fits.

Effort1–2 weeks
Pattern 03

Approval workflows

Rule-based routing of approvals. Auto-approve below thresholds, escalate above. Slack-native sign-offs replace email chains.

Effort2 weeks
Pattern 04

Dashboards on demand

Replacing manually-built Monday reports with live dashboards. Self-serve, single source of truth, refresh-free.

Effort2–3 weeks
Pattern 05

Customer self-service

"Where's my order?" "Can I reset my password?" "When's my invoice due?" Moving these out of the support inbox.

Effort3–4 weeks
Pattern 06

Auto-triage & tagging

AI-classified inbound — emails, tickets, leads. Routes to the right team with a context summary attached.

Effort2 weeks

Five artefacts. Execution-ready.

Not a 100-page report. Five tight artefacts your team can act on this week. Process maps in your tool of choice, the hit-list in Linear, the ROI in Excel.

01 · Audit report

Friction findings, scored

The headline narrative: what's broken, why, how it shows up, who feels it. Scored against the DOWNTIME wastes. 12–18 page PDF, board-ready.

PDF · Notion source
02 · Process maps

3 current-state maps

The three highest-friction processes mapped as visual swim-lanes — actors, steps, time-in-step, hand-offs, system touches. Editable in FigJam or Miro.

FigJam · Miro
03 · Hit list

Prioritised fixes · scored

20–40 specific opportunities, each with effort estimate, expected impact, ROI band, owner suggestion. Sorted by quick-wins → strategic bets.

Linear-ready CSV
04 · ROI model

Spreadsheet your CFO can poke

Labour hours saved, cycle-time reduction, SaaS spend reclaimed, automation cost — modelled per opportunity. Sensitivity to assumptions built in.

Excel · Google Sheets
05 · 90-day execution plan

What to do · in what order

The first 90 days of execution sequenced — quick wins in weeks 1-4, deeper fixes in weeks 5-9, strategic moves teed up for weeks 9-13. Owner-tagged.

Notion · Gantt
06 · Exec readout

90-min board presentation

We present the findings to your board / exco. Slides included. We answer the awkward questions in the room — so you don't have to defend the report cold.

Keynote · PPT

4 phases. Listen → Observe → Map → Recommend.

You'll spend ~10 hours across the engagement — most in week 1 (interviews) + the final readout. The middle two weeks we're in your systems & sitting with your teams.

01
Week 1 · 4 hrs

Interviews

12–18 stakeholder interviews. Operators, supervisors, customers. Themes coded; SOPs collected.

02
Week 2 · 3 hrs

Observe + measure

Gemba walks, system-log mining, SaaS audit. Time-tracking diary starts with 4 volunteers.

03
Week 3 · 2 hrs

Map + score

Process maps drafted. DOWNTIME scoring applied. Hit-list assembled. ROI model populated.

04
Week 4 · 1 hr

Recommend + ship

90-day plan finalised. Exec readout delivered. Hand-over to your team or our build squad.

The numbers behind a process audit that shipped.

Aggregated from operations engagements 6+ months out. Your numbers will be yours — these are the order-of-magnitude bracket.

−68%
Cycle time
Median reduction on the top-3 audited processes after fixes ship.
23%
Capacity freed
Median FTE-hours per week reclaimed, redirected to higher-value work.
R 22k
SaaS reclaimed
Median monthly subscription spend cancelled or consolidated.
R 1.4M
Year-1 value
Median first-year labour + SaaS savings across the top-3 fixes.

Pick the breadth. We deliver in 3–6 weeks.

Fee fixed in writing. The audit is yours — implementation is your team's call. We don't take a percentage of savings; we charge a fixed fee and tell you the truth.

Single-process

Focused audit

R7,000
/project · ex 15% VAT
  • 1 process audited deep
  • 6–8 interviews
  • 1 current-state + 1 future-state map
  • Top-5 hit list
  • 30-min readout
Choose Single →
Embedded

6-week + execution support

R56,000+
+ optional execution sprint · ex VAT
  • Everything in Full audit
  • Up to 5 processes mapped
  • 2-week execution sprint co-piloted
  • Weekly check-in for 60 days
  • Optional fractional COO (from R18k/mo)
Talk to us →

Questions from COOs & ops leads.

If yours isn't here, send us a current-state SOP or screen recording of your team working. We'll come back with a written critique in 48h.

Will the team feel surveilled?
It depends on framing. We always introduce the engagement with the team first — explicit "we're here to fix the process, not assess the people." Operators usually become the strongest allies; they know what's broken. We never share individual diary data with management; only aggregates. If your culture won't tolerate this, the engagement won't work, and we'll say so up front.
How is this different from a Lean Six Sigma consultant?
Three differences: Senior-only delivery — one practitioner, not a team of Yellow Belts. Tech-fluent — most operations have a SaaS / data / AI angle these days; we bring that lens natively. Faster — 4 weeks, not 4 months. We also typically charge 3–5× less. We respect the Lean tradition (we use DOWNTIME) but we're not selling the methodology, we're selling the outcome.
Do you also implement the fixes?
Sometimes. We offer a separate execution sprint (Embedded tier) where we co-pilot the first 2-3 fixes alongside your team. For tech-heavy fixes, our Software & SaaS Development or AI Consultation teams take it from there. But there's no implicit upsell — the audit is yours, and you can hand it to any vendor or do it yourselves.
What if our SOPs don't exist?
Common. About 60% of clients we audit have informal or out-of-date SOPs. We don't need them as input — we map the current state from observation + interviews. As a side effect of the engagement, you'll end up with documented SOPs (the future-state ones) for the audited processes.
POPIA — what about access to systems & logs?
We sign a POPIA-compliant DPA before kick-off. System access is read-only and time-bound. We don't extract customer-level PII for analysis — we work in aggregates and timestamps. Where individual records help (e.g. tracing one quote's lifecycle), we anonymise before referencing in deliverables.
What if we already use a Lean / Six Sigma framework?
Great — we'll use your existing terminology and lenses. The DOWNTIME taxonomy is our default but if your team uses Value Stream Mapping or A3 problem-solving, we'll deliver in that format. The engagement is about your operation; the framework is just the lens.
Can we focus on a single department vs the whole business?
Yes — the Single-process tier is exactly for that. Common starting points: AP/AR, customer onboarding, new-hire onboarding, order-to-cash, support escalation, month-end close. Pick one process that's painful + costly, audit it, ship the fixes, then decide if the rest of the business gets the same treatment.
What's the smallest version of this?
If R7k is too much, we offer a 1-day diagnostic (R 3,000) — one of our seniors spends a day on-site, walks the process, scores it against DOWNTIME, and leaves you with a 1-pager listing the top-3 fixes. You can DIY from there or scale up to a full audit later.

Send us a process flow.
We'll send back the bottlenecks.

Draw your most painful process on a napkin, take a photo, and email it to us. Or send the SOP, or a screen recording of the team doing it. Within 48 hours we'll come back with a written critique: the 3 biggest bottlenecks we see, the 1 thing to fix this week, and whether a full audit is the right next step.

You'll get back in 48h

  • Top 3 bottlenecks
  • 1 thing to fix this week
  • Quick automation candidate
  • Honest "is this worth auditing" call

More Business & Digital Strategy services

Digital Transformation Roadmap

A clear plan to modernise your business.

Go-To-Market Strategy

Launch the right thing, the right way.

Product Strategy

What to build, in what order, and why.